QU3 Dossier
Integration
  • Introduction to QU3
    • What is QU3?
    • Vision and Mission
    • Roadmap
  • Meet QU3
    • Quantum‑Safe MCP Servers
    • MCP Platform
    • Ecosystem Flow
  • APPENDIX
    • References
    • Privacy Policy
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Meet QU3

Ecosystem Flow

Last updated 9 days ago

Client Input Rate U(t) - Black curve

Represents external requests—model inferences, policy updates, or key‑rotation commands—arriving at the platform. We approximate a cyclic day‑night usage pattern with a shifted sine:

U(t)=1+sin⁡(t)U(t)=1+\sin(t)U(t)=1+sin(t)

MCP Console Dispatch C(t) - Green curve

The Console accepts user traffic, attaches context metadata, and forwards the job to an available enclave. Its capacity scales the incoming wave by a factor 2 (extra batching, caching, and queueing efficiency):

Peaks mark surge periods when the Console pipelines requests aggressively toward runtimes.

Enclave Runtime Output R(t) - Purple curve

Inside each TEE, the model executes; quantum‑secured sealing adds slight latency jitter, model complexity adds phase shift. We model that with a combined sine + cosine term:

The higher amplitude reflects heavy compute bursts during complex inference.

Post‑Quantum Attestation Confidence A(t) - Blue curve

Every enclave response is signed and verified. A sigmoid captures the probability that an attestation passes on the first try versus requiring re‑challenge when load is high (the sigmoid uses the Console load as input):

When dispatch traffic spikes, the curve flattens near 1, indicating continuous but still‑valid proofs.

 Policy‑Engine Throughput P(t) - Green & Purple overlap

The Policy Engine releases only data that satisfy leakage and rate rules. We scale the compute output by the attestation confidence and add a small constant 0.2 that represents baseline system messages (health pings, key‑rotation notices):

Overlaying P(t) atop the run‑time and attestation curves shows how security gates throttle raw enclave output into a smooth, policy‑compliant stream.

Interpretation

  • Oscillation alignment between U(t) and C(t) demonstrates that the Console can elastically match client demand.

  • R(t) spikes above C(t)—enclaves amplify compute intensity relative to request count.

  • A(t) never drops below 0.5, signalling that post‑quantum attestations remain reliable even when request volume surges.

  • The final P(t) overlay confirms the platform’s goal: consistent, auditable throughput that is bounded by both compute capacity and security verification, ready for anchoring to the inter‑chain Audit Ledger.

C(t)=2(1+sin⁡(t))C(t)=2\bigl(1+\sin(t)\bigr)C(t)=2(1+sin(t))
R(t)=3sin⁡(t)+2cos⁡(t)R(t)=3\sin(t)+2\cos(t)R(t)=3sin(t)+2cos(t)
A(t)=11+e−0.5 C(t)A(t)=\frac{1}{1+e^{-0.5\,C(t)}}A(t)=1+e−0.5C(t)1​
P(t)=R(t) A(t)+0.2P(t)=R(t)\,A(t)+0.2P(t)=R(t)A(t)+0.2
This graph plots simplified analytic functions that approximate how load and security checks propagate through a Quantum‑Safe MCP deployment. Each colour corresponds to one subsystem; the overlay demonstrates the compound effect on final, policy‑filtered throughput.